The sfmta board hearing from August 20 is linked below. The time
markings of taxi-related material are as follows:
Under item# 7, Director's report, Ed Reiskin summarizes the CPUC
rule-making developments (28:18 - 39:52).
Some of the public comment on item 7 is from taxi members (Barry
Taranto, then Hansu Kim from 48:05 - 52:40; Tariq Mehmood, then Tone Lee
from 1:01:50 - 1:06:18; Bill Mounsey from 1:08:22 - 1:10:32).
Many of the speakers under item # 9, general public comment, were
non-taxi, but some were from taxi (Bill Mounsey 1:14:20 - 1:16:30; Barry
Taranto, then Hansu Kim 1:31:00 - 1:35:20; Tariq Mehmood, then Tone Lee
1:39:32 - 1:43:45; Emil Lawrence, then Barry Korengold 1:48:44 - 1:53:12).
Consent calendar item # 10.11 contained a controversial proposal to
require annual training henceforth for all taxi drivers (2:08:56 -
2:38:11). Chris Hayashi makes explanatory comments, ten public speakers
weigh in, then the board has a brief discussion and approves the
legislation.
http://sanfrancisco.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=55&clip_id=18214
Saturday, August 24, 2013
Thursday, August 22, 2013
Fw: Board of Appeals - Aug 14th, 2013
From 05:14 - 38:10 on the link below, the Board of Appeals considered a
proposed Memorandum of Understanding last night between BOA and SFMTA
defining the conditions and inclusion of future appeals by taxicab permit
holders. Director Chris Hayashi made a presentation, five industry members
made speeches, and then all five BOA Board members stated that they were
opposed to the MOU.
http://sanfrancisco.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=6&clip_id=18179
proposed Memorandum of Understanding last night between BOA and SFMTA
defining the conditions and inclusion of future appeals by taxicab permit
holders. Director Chris Hayashi made a presentation, five industry members
made speeches, and then all five BOA Board members stated that they were
opposed to the MOU.
http://sanfrancisco.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=6&clip_id=18179
Wednesday, June 19, 2013
Fw: Municipal Transportation Agency Meeting - June 18th, 2013
The June 18 sfmta board hearing is linked below. Taxi speakers under
general public comment are Hansu Kim (31:04 - 33:18), Emil Lawrence
(37:49 -
40:00), and Mary McGuire (40:19 - 42:12). From 43:16 - 44:24, there is a
discussion between deputy city attorney, Mariam Morley, and Director
Heinicke, who made a query regarding the anticipated time frame for a
decision by the CPUC in their current rulemaking process regarding Uber,
Lyft, et al.
Item # 12, from 1:37:50 - 1:51:18, pertains to minor Transportation Code
amendments involving medallion transfer fees and contributions to the
drivers' fund. Hansu Kim (1:38:40 - 1:40:40), Mary McGuire ( 1:40:48 -
1:43:05), and Tone Lee (1:43:10 - 1:45:15) speak. The final six minutes of
the session involve an approval vote, a question by Director Heinicke, and
a
response from Chris Hayashi updating the drivers' fund status.
http://sanfrancisco.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=55&clip_id=17781
general public comment are Hansu Kim (31:04 - 33:18), Emil Lawrence
(37:49 -
40:00), and Mary McGuire (40:19 - 42:12). From 43:16 - 44:24, there is a
discussion between deputy city attorney, Mariam Morley, and Director
Heinicke, who made a query regarding the anticipated time frame for a
decision by the CPUC in their current rulemaking process regarding Uber,
Lyft, et al.
Item # 12, from 1:37:50 - 1:51:18, pertains to minor Transportation Code
amendments involving medallion transfer fees and contributions to the
drivers' fund. Hansu Kim (1:38:40 - 1:40:40), Mary McGuire ( 1:40:48 -
1:43:05), and Tone Lee (1:43:10 - 1:45:15) speak. The final six minutes of
the session involve an approval vote, a question by Director Heinicke, and
a
response from Chris Hayashi updating the drivers' fund status.
http://sanfrancisco.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=55&clip_id=17781
Tuesday, February 5, 2013
Fw: Municipal Transportation Agency meeting dated February 5, 2013
The sfmta board meeting from today is linked below. Under general public
comment from 49:12 - 1:01:42, there are five taxi speakers --- Mark
Gruberg,
Ed Healy, Carl Macmurdo, Mary McGuire, and Barry Korengold --- and a brief
board discussion.
http://sanfrancisco.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=55&clip_id=16769
comment from 49:12 - 1:01:42, there are five taxi speakers --- Mark
Gruberg,
Ed Healy, Carl Macmurdo, Mary McGuire, and Barry Korengold --- and a brief
board discussion.
http://sanfrancisco.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=55&clip_id=16769
Wednesday, November 21, 2012
The MTA Truncates the List
Video of the SFMTA board meeting of November 20 is available here:
Click here for the video.
Items 11 and 12 were combined, from 0:20:45 to 1:07. Item 11 pertained to truncating the medallion waiting list permanently as a source for non-purchased medallions.
The proposal at the meeting was to allow 150 future medallions to be bought at half-price ($150,000) by top list applicants. The board raised the number of future medallions 200 and approved the item. Some speakers were very emotional. Angst and pathos were abundant, and a few speakers abandoned any notion of civility towards the board.
Under item 9, general public comment, roughly half the speakers are from taxi (2:01:10 - 2:35:38). Item 13, technically a vote to extend the implementation date for electronic waybills until February 28, 2013, engendered conversation on the perceived need for a universal smart phone GPS based application, so as to copy UBER's business model (2:35 - 2:51).
Click here for the video.
Items 11 and 12 were combined, from 0:20:45 to 1:07. Item 11 pertained to truncating the medallion waiting list permanently as a source for non-purchased medallions.
The proposal at the meeting was to allow 150 future medallions to be bought at half-price ($150,000) by top list applicants. The board raised the number of future medallions 200 and approved the item. Some speakers were very emotional. Angst and pathos were abundant, and a few speakers abandoned any notion of civility towards the board.
Under item 9, general public comment, roughly half the speakers are from taxi (2:01:10 - 2:35:38). Item 13, technically a vote to extend the implementation date for electronic waybills until February 28, 2013, engendered conversation on the perceived need for a universal smart phone GPS based application, so as to copy UBER's business model (2:35 - 2:51).
Tuesday, October 16, 2012
Fw: Municipal Transportation Agency hearing on October 16, 2012
The sfmta board hearing from today is linked below. The public comment
agenda item (3:08:40 - 3:52:20) was delayed for hours. Speakers were
limited
to one minute.
Many of the speakers were either incensed by recent policy developments,
or otherwise passionate about their chosen topic. Most comments regard the
issue that sfmta recently issued 150 - 200 medallions to itself for
subsequent direct leasing to color schemes, as opposed to the long-standing
practice of issuing medallions to waiting list applicants.
On November 20, sfmta plans to make final decisions on future waitlist
policy and other taxi issues.
http://sanfrancisco.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=55&clip_id=16138
agenda item (3:08:40 - 3:52:20) was delayed for hours. Speakers were
limited
to one minute.
Many of the speakers were either incensed by recent policy developments,
or otherwise passionate about their chosen topic. Most comments regard the
issue that sfmta recently issued 150 - 200 medallions to itself for
subsequent direct leasing to color schemes, as opposed to the long-standing
practice of issuing medallions to waiting list applicants.
On November 20, sfmta plans to make final decisions on future waitlist
policy and other taxi issues.
http://sanfrancisco.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=55&clip_id=16138
Friday, October 5, 2012
Medallion Appeal Rejection
Recently, SFMTA issued itself 150 new medallions for direct leasing to qualified color schemes. The United Taxicab Workers (UTW) filed an appeal with city's Appeals Board. The city attorney intervened with the opinion that Proposition A of 2007 allows SFMTA to determine how many new medallions are needed and that the Appeals Board no longer has jurisdiction over this determination, although the Appeals Board does continue to have jurisdiction over permit denials and permit suspensions and revocations. The letter linked below describes the city attorney's opinion. UTW has now exercised its right to convert the appeal into a request for jurisdiction, which the Appeals Board will consider at its October 24 hearing. As stated in the city's letter, that filing does not suspend SFMTA's right to issue the 150 medallions.
Click on this link to view the letter:
Medallion Appeal Rejection Letter
Click on this link to view the letter:
Medallion Appeal Rejection Letter
Thursday, September 6, 2012
September 4, 2012, sfmta board meeting
Linked below is the September 4, 2012, sfmta board meeting. Item # 11 is
a proposal for sfmta to issue from 150 - 200 new taxi medallions to
themselves for direct leasing to color schemes which meet radio dispatch
performance criteria that sfmta is developing. It is a three-year pilot
program, with a suggested monthly leasing fee of about $1,900.
Beginning at 31:50, Director Reiskin takes five minutes to introduce the
measure. Then, from 36:40 - 1:41:22, a spectrum of individuals make speeches
(taxi company representatives. taxi drivers including medallion waiting list
applicants, and officials from the hotel, restaurant, and chamber of
commerce associations.) From 1:41:22 - 2:09:10, the directors discuss and
then unanimously approve the proposal. Mr. Reiskin states near the end that
he will present a definitive proposal as to the future of the medallion
waiting list at one of the next two board meetings (i.e., either September
28 or October 16.)
After a ten-minute recess, there is general public comment under item # 9
(2:20:26 - 2:45:13), consisting mostly of taxi drivers.
http://sanfrancisco.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=55&clip_id=15853
a proposal for sfmta to issue from 150 - 200 new taxi medallions to
themselves for direct leasing to color schemes which meet radio dispatch
performance criteria that sfmta is developing. It is a three-year pilot
program, with a suggested monthly leasing fee of about $1,900.
Beginning at 31:50, Director Reiskin takes five minutes to introduce the
measure. Then, from 36:40 - 1:41:22, a spectrum of individuals make speeches
(taxi company representatives. taxi drivers including medallion waiting list
applicants, and officials from the hotel, restaurant, and chamber of
commerce associations.) From 1:41:22 - 2:09:10, the directors discuss and
then unanimously approve the proposal. Mr. Reiskin states near the end that
he will present a definitive proposal as to the future of the medallion
waiting list at one of the next two board meetings (i.e., either September
28 or October 16.)
After a ten-minute recess, there is general public comment under item # 9
(2:20:26 - 2:45:13), consisting mostly of taxi drivers.
http://sanfrancisco.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=55&clip_id=15853
Tuesday, August 28, 2012
AUGUST 2012: New SFMTA Medallion Transfer Program
The sfmta board approved a new medallion transfer program at its August
21, 2012 meeting. The program is described as "permanent" and replaces the
medallion sales pilot program effective September 20, 2012.
Here are the main features:
1. All Proposition K and pre-K medallion holders age 60 and older, or
who are disabled, may "surrender" their medallion to sfmta, which will
compensate the outgoing medallion holder with a $200,000 payment. This is
the same pre-capital gains taxes net amount received by sellers under the
pilot program (i.e., during the pilot, medallions sold for $250,000 , less a
$50,000 transfer fee).
2. SFMTA intends to sell the surrendered medallions to qualified taxi
driver applicants at a new set price of $300,000.
The sfmta board approved a new medallion transfer program at its August
21, 2012 meeting. The program is described as "permanent" and replaces the
medallion sales pilot program effective September 20, 2012.
Here are the main features:
1. All Proposition K and pre-K medallion holders age 60 and older, or
who are disabled, may "surrender" their medallion to sfmta, which will
compensate the outgoing medallion holder with a $200,000 payment. This is
the same pre-capital gains taxes net amount received by sellers under the
pilot program (i.e., during the pilot, medallions sold for $250,000 , less a
$50,000 transfer fee).
2. SFMTA intends to sell the surrendered medallions to qualified taxi
driver applicants at a new set price of $300,000.
Wednesday, July 18, 2012
MTA board meeting of July 17, 2012
The July 17 SFMTA board hearing is linked below. Twelve of the fourteen speakers under general public comment, from 1:05 - 1:34, are from taxi (Hansu Kim - Tone Lee - Jeet Ghotra - Barry Taranto - Brian Rosen - Bill Mounsey - Keith Dennis - Mary McGuire - Mark Gruberg - Emil Lawrence - Barry Korengold - G. Singh). The Uber topic is addressed by a few speakers.
During a prior item, it was revealed that the finance officer, Sonali Bose, is no longer in the taxi reporting chain, so that the taxi director (Chris Hayashi's position) now reports directly to Transportation Director, Ed Reiskin.
http://sanfrancisco.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=55&clip_id=15602
During a prior item, it was revealed that the finance officer, Sonali Bose, is no longer in the taxi reporting chain, so that the taxi director (Chris Hayashi's position) now reports directly to Transportation Director, Ed Reiskin.
http://sanfrancisco.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=55&clip_id=15602
Sunday, May 20, 2012
Wednesday, April 4, 2012
MTA Board meeting of April 3
Linked below is the SFMTA Board meeting from April 3, 2012. Under the budget proposal item, Hansu Kim speaks from 1:38:00 - 1:40:15 regarding the opportunity sfmta is ignoring to generate major revenue by expanding the medallion sales program. Jim Gillespie (1:49:52 - 1:51:50) and Nate Dwiri (1:53:43 - 1:54:50) address the concern that the schedule of fees and fines proposed for the taxi industry lack a reasoned basis for justification. Mr. Kim addresses the board again under general public comment (5:52:30 - 5:54:45), advising that sfmta will meet serious pushback from the industry, plus potential liability responsibilities, were it to proceed in the direction of leasing out taxi medallions itself.
http://sanfrancisco.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=55&clip_id=14722
Wednesday, December 7, 2011
Municipal Transportation Agency hearing dated December 6, 2011
Here is the 12-06-11 sfmta board hearing link. Under general public comment (item 9), Charles Rathbone speaks from 46:02 - 48:00. Later, from 51:56 - 1:03:15, speakers are Laurie Graham, Peter Witt, Tariq Mehmood, Barry Taranto, and Steve Reimers.The Nygaard consultants' report on credit card fees, backseat terminals, and electronic waybills is item 16 from 1:38:45 - 3:02:10. Item 17, regarding Transportation Code amendments including eligibility for selling medallions when the application process briefly re-opens in the near future, is from 3:12:20 - 4:17:07. Although the Board voted to exclude pre-K participation at this time, it was explained that a permanent medallion system proposal is expected within three months, so that the Board did not want a large expansion of the pilot program in the interim.
http://sanfrancisco.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=55&clip_id=13771
Monday, November 14, 2011
Emailing the SFMTA board
MTABoard@sfmta.com is the e-mail address for sending messages to the sfmta directors, including CEO Ed Reiskin, plus a few other sfmta officials. On December 6, the sfmta board will consider some taxi amendments, one of which will re-open the opportunity for medallion holders age 60 and above, or who are disabled, to sell their permits. Although not included in the original taxi advisory council recommendation, taxi staff has added a clause to disallow pre-K medallion holders from participating in the process. Just today, I learned that certain activists are now lobbying the sfmta directors also to raise the participation age from 60 up to 65 years old. My e-mail on the pre-K exclusionary clause is attached below. Likely, I will write a separate e-mail to explain why medallion holders in the 60-64 age range should be included. It will be helpful if our members who have strong feelings on these issues can e-mail the sfmta board with your opinions.
---------------------------------------------------------
To: SFMTA Board
From: Carl Macmurdo
Date: November 4, 2011
Dear SFMTA Board members,
On December 6, you will consider proposed taxicab legislation for inclusion into the Transportation Code. This e-mail requests an amendment to one specific item. On September 26, the taxi advisory council (TAC) passed a resolution by a 9 to 5 vote recommending that sfmta re-open the process under the medallion sales pilot program to allow medallion holders age 60 and above, or with disabilities, a 30-day window to register as sellers. Subsequently, DTAS staff unilaterally added a clause which disallows participation by the 300 or so pre-K medallion holders. Staff's liaison stated that the same public safety policy reason for needing an exit strategy for K (also known as post-K) medallion holders --- who have a driving requirement --- doesn't apply to the pre-K's, who are not obligated to drive. Although this point is accurate, it does not explain or justify why the pre-K's should be excluded.
Here are reasons for pre-K inclusion:
(1) More than 1,400 taxi drivers on the waiting list have registered to purchase taxi medallions at the set price of $250,000. Allowing the pool of interested pre-K medallion holders to participate might make 100 - 200 more medallions available, so that the aspirant buyers can begin building equity in their future. The Pilot is very successful. Why not allow willing sellers and buyers to match up?
(2) Each transfer will generate a $37,500 transfer fee to sfmta.
(3) Having younger, active drivers replace the already retired pre-K's who want to sell will revitalize the industry to an extent.
(4) Pre-K's were included in the first round of Pilot participation in 2010 and should continue to be eligible.
(5) The pre-K's bought their medallions prior to 1978 with the understanding their permits were transferable. Proposition K of 1978 abrogated the transferability aspect. It seems fair and equitable to offer this opportunity once again.
At the October 24 TAC meeting, a motion to remove the controversial clause added by DTAS staff failed by a 6 to 6 tie vote. Various speakers made vitriolic remarks, steeped in jealousy, about the pre-K's. In actuality, most pre-K's are former career taxi drivers who helped build the San Francisco taxi industry. A typical pre-K is more aptly described as "Gas and Gates Bill" than as Bill Gates.
Presently, the proposed legislation is Transportation Code Sec. 1116(a)(3): "Any Medallion Holder who is subject to the Full-Time Driving Requirement who has attained or will attain the age of 60 as of December 31, 2012."
My request is that you amend the proposed legislation by removing the phrase "who is subject to the Full-Time Driving Requirement." Otherwise, that clause effectively excludes pre-K medallion holders from the sales process.
The pre-K's should be included for the reasons stated above.
Thank you for your consideration.
---------------------------------------------------------
To: SFMTA Board
From: Carl Macmurdo
Date: November 4, 2011
Dear SFMTA Board members,
On December 6, you will consider proposed taxicab legislation for inclusion into the Transportation Code. This e-mail requests an amendment to one specific item. On September 26, the taxi advisory council (TAC) passed a resolution by a 9 to 5 vote recommending that sfmta re-open the process under the medallion sales pilot program to allow medallion holders age 60 and above, or with disabilities, a 30-day window to register as sellers. Subsequently, DTAS staff unilaterally added a clause which disallows participation by the 300 or so pre-K medallion holders. Staff's liaison stated that the same public safety policy reason for needing an exit strategy for K (also known as post-K) medallion holders --- who have a driving requirement --- doesn't apply to the pre-K's, who are not obligated to drive. Although this point is accurate, it does not explain or justify why the pre-K's should be excluded.
Here are reasons for pre-K inclusion:
(1) More than 1,400 taxi drivers on the waiting list have registered to purchase taxi medallions at the set price of $250,000. Allowing the pool of interested pre-K medallion holders to participate might make 100 - 200 more medallions available, so that the aspirant buyers can begin building equity in their future. The Pilot is very successful. Why not allow willing sellers and buyers to match up?
(2) Each transfer will generate a $37,500 transfer fee to sfmta.
(3) Having younger, active drivers replace the already retired pre-K's who want to sell will revitalize the industry to an extent.
(4) Pre-K's were included in the first round of Pilot participation in 2010 and should continue to be eligible.
(5) The pre-K's bought their medallions prior to 1978 with the understanding their permits were transferable. Proposition K of 1978 abrogated the transferability aspect. It seems fair and equitable to offer this opportunity once again.
At the October 24 TAC meeting, a motion to remove the controversial clause added by DTAS staff failed by a 6 to 6 tie vote. Various speakers made vitriolic remarks, steeped in jealousy, about the pre-K's. In actuality, most pre-K's are former career taxi drivers who helped build the San Francisco taxi industry. A typical pre-K is more aptly described as "Gas and Gates Bill" than as Bill Gates.
Presently, the proposed legislation is Transportation Code Sec. 1116(a)(3): "Any Medallion Holder who is subject to the Full-Time Driving Requirement who has attained or will attain the age of 60 as of December 31, 2012."
My request is that you amend the proposed legislation by removing the phrase "who is subject to the Full-Time Driving Requirement." Otherwise, that clause effectively excludes pre-K medallion holders from the sales process.
The pre-K's should be included for the reasons stated above.
Thank you for your consideration.
Wednesday, October 19, 2011
MTA board hearing dated October 18, 2011
The October 18 SFMTA Board hearing linked below has a segment from 00:46 - 4:28 wherein Bruce Oka asks for the next Board meeting agenda to include an item to allow older and disabled medallion holders to sell their medallions via a re-opening of the sellers' application process under the Medallion Sales Pilot Program. A brief discussion ensues. From 1:27:17 - 141:00, six taxi industry members speak under general public comment.
http://sanfrancisco.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=55&clip_id=13451
http://sanfrancisco.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=55&clip_id=13451
Tuesday, September 20, 2011
MTA Board meeting dated September 20, 2011
The sfmta board meeting today is linked below. Under item # 7, from 3:30 - 9:00, a taxi driver receives an award for heroism. Under item # 9, general public comment, most speakers are from taxi (37:06 - 54:00 on the time bar).
http://sanfrancisco.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=55&clip_id=13162
http://sanfrancisco.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=55&clip_id=13162
Wednesday, September 7, 2011
MTA Board meeting September 6, 2011
The SFMTA Board meeting from September 6 is linked below. It was the initial hearing headed by new CEO Ed Reiskin, who replaced Nat Ford. Some taxi drivers spoke under earlier items, but item # 9, general public comment, consists mostly of taxi drivers and is located from 105:25 - 1:41:25 on the time bar.
http://sanfrancisco.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=55&clip_id=13037
http://sanfrancisco.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=55&clip_id=13037
Wednesday, August 3, 2011
MTA meeting on August 2, 2011
At the SFMTA Board meeting on August 2, taxi drivers were granted a meter rate increase. Also, the Board
authorized 87 new medallions, fifty of which will be part-time single-user permits to be operated under a pilot
program. From 40:19 - 1:48:23 on the time bar, there are speakers and Board discussions on these items. Numerous taxi speakers also participate in the general public comment item from 2:22:26 - 2:56:48.
http://sanfrancisco.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=55&clip_id=12850
authorized 87 new medallions, fifty of which will be part-time single-user permits to be operated under a pilot
program. From 40:19 - 1:48:23 on the time bar, there are speakers and Board discussions on these items. Numerous taxi speakers also participate in the general public comment item from 2:22:26 - 2:56:48.
http://sanfrancisco.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=55&clip_id=12850
Tuesday, June 21, 2011
MTA board meeting of June 21, 2011
Linked below is the SFMTA Board meeting from earlier today. From 46:03 - 1:26:00 there are approximately thirty speakers under general public comment. All but three are from the taxi industry. There was a well-supported protest outside city hall from noon to 2 p.m., as taxi drivers circled around to demonstrate their opposition to back-seat terminals, electronic waybills, and 5% credit card fees.
http://sanfrancisco.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=55&clip_id=12568
http://sanfrancisco.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=55&clip_id=12568
Friday, May 20, 2011
SFMTA Meeting of May 17, 2011
You can watch the meeting by clicking here:
There are two taxi agenda topics. Item # 11 is a proposed meter increase, and item 12 is an amendment to vacate the implementation date previously mandated for electronic waybills. The items were heard together.
From 12:27 - 34:00 , Nat Ford, Chris Hayashi, Chris Sweis, Sonali Bose, and the Board members address, explain, and discuss the topics. Many speakers from the taxi industry address the Board from 34:00 - 1:36:00. From 1:36: - 1:58:40, the Board has more discussion and holds a vote.
The situation is a bit confusing. On Monday, May 16, the taxi advisory council (TAC) had approved an amended meter increase recommendation that was put before the Board yesterday. However, the original, non-amended proposal had been the version noticed for yesterday's hearing. Because of Sunshine Ordinance rules, the Board could not act on the flag drop aspect (which will make the drop $3.50, rather than the current $3.10 rate), but did approve the other meter raise components, which were identical in the original and amended versions (new rates of $2.75 per mile and $33 per minute for waiting time). The flag drop will be voted in on June 21.
Director Jerry Lee wants the credit card processing fee controversy resolved and has requested that it be done on June 21 as well. Director Malcolm Heinicke wants a peak-time medallion program in operation as a condition of having the meter increase finalized on June 21. It is doubtful that this can be accomplished by that date, but hopefully there will be enough Board votes on June 21 to approve the meter increase regardless. That said, it seems obvious that the TAC will at least hold a debate in the interim on the peak-time issue and create movement of some kind towards designing a pilot program. Also, town hall meetings on three dates in early June will focus on this topic, along with discussions regarding electronic waybills.
Under general public comment, item # 9, there are numerous taxi speakers, from 3:13:20 - 3:39:40.
SFMTA Meeting of May 3, 2011
The SFMTA meeting held on Tuesday is linked below. Under item # 7, the executive director's report, CEO Nat Ford begins mentioning taxi issues at 16:05 on the time bar. From 20:04 - 1:49:12, approximately 80 taxi drivers make one-minute speeches. Reportedly, honking taxis circled city hall for hours as part of the overall protest action.
Most speakers objected to electronic waybills as an intrusion of privacy, while arguing that implementation of the new waybill system might cause re-classification of taxi drivers as employees, rather than independent contractors. Speakers argued against the 5% credit card processing fees, although some of the drivers indicated that a lower rate of 2 or 3 per cent might be reasonable.
General public comment is at the end of the tape, from 3:24:40 - 3:35:21 and consists mainly of a few taxi drivers addressing other industry issues.
Most speakers objected to electronic waybills as an intrusion of privacy, while arguing that implementation of the new waybill system might cause re-classification of taxi drivers as employees, rather than independent contractors. Speakers argued against the 5% credit card processing fees, although some of the drivers indicated that a lower rate of 2 or 3 per cent might be reasonable.
General public comment is at the end of the tape, from 3:24:40 - 3:35:21 and consists mainly of a few taxi drivers addressing other industry issues.
SFMTA Meeting of April 19, 2011
The April 19 MTA Board hearing is linked below. Under item # 7, the Executive Director's report, Nathaniel Ford discusses a Ramp Taxi incentive program, then comments on taxi concerns from the prior Board meeting regarding a meter and gate hearing, credit card processing fees, and electronic waybills. There is public comment on this item. The time frame for all of this is 19:56 - 34:30.
There are no taxi items on the agenda, but four drivers speak under item # 9, general public comment, from 51:00 - 59:28.
Item # 11, from 1:31:00 - 2:06:50 is not directly related to taxi but may have traffic impacts. It is a plan to re-design Hayes and Fell as two-ways streets in the areas of Market or Van Ness to Gough. Some drivers address the Board during the public comment phase.
http://sanfrancisco.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=55&clip_id=12004
There are no taxi items on the agenda, but four drivers speak under item # 9, general public comment, from 51:00 - 59:28.
Item # 11, from 1:31:00 - 2:06:50 is not directly related to taxi but may have traffic impacts. It is a plan to re-design Hayes and Fell as two-ways streets in the areas of Market or Van Ness to Gough. Some drivers address the Board during the public comment phase.
http://sanfrancisco.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=55&clip_id=12004
SFMTA meeting of April 5, 2011
The SFMTA meeting is linked below. There were no taxi topics on the agenda, but twenty-five taxi drivers spoke under the general public comment item. A driver speaks from 32:06 - 34:10 on the time bar. Then, from 42:00 -1:28:30 all but one of the 25 speakers are taxi drivers. Most of the speeches pertain to the 5% credit card processing fees and the imminent electronic waybill system. From 1:28:31 - 1:38:48 the SFMTA Board directors discuss the public comment.
http://sanfrancisco.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=55&clip_id=11899
http://sanfrancisco.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=55&clip_id=11899
SFMTA meeting of March 2, 2011
The MTA Board hearing is linked below. There are five separate locations of relevant footage.
From 7:36-15:14, taxi services staff receives a group recognition award. Barry Taranto and Dave Schneider speak from 24:12-27:12 on this agenda item (#7, Executive Director's Report, which encompasses other topics as well.)
Under item #9, general public comment, three of the five speakers from 31:44-44:12 are taxi drivers (Christopher Fulkerson, B. Taranto, D.Schneider.)
Consent calendar item # 10.9, concerning administrative penalties for taxi drivers, is addressed by two speakers from 1:04:11-1:08:27 (B. Taranto, Tara Housman.)
Item # 11 pertains to referring the MTA Board proposal for a peak time taxi medallion system to the taxi advisory council for input and feedback. The Board unanimously approved the referral resolution. Prior to comments by Directors Heinicke and Oka, there are eight speakers (C. Fulkerson, B. Taranto. D. Schneider, Ed Healy, Carl Macmurdo, Tone Lee, Peter Witt, and Mark Gruberg.) The footage is from 1:08:28-1:30:30.
http://sanfrancisco.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=55&clip_id=11685
From 7:36-15:14, taxi services staff receives a group recognition award. Barry Taranto and Dave Schneider speak from 24:12-27:12 on this agenda item (#7, Executive Director's Report, which encompasses other topics as well.)
Under item #9, general public comment, three of the five speakers from 31:44-44:12 are taxi drivers (Christopher Fulkerson, B. Taranto, D.Schneider.)
Consent calendar item # 10.9, concerning administrative penalties for taxi drivers, is addressed by two speakers from 1:04:11-1:08:27 (B. Taranto, Tara Housman.)
Item # 11 pertains to referring the MTA Board proposal for a peak time taxi medallion system to the taxi advisory council for input and feedback. The Board unanimously approved the referral resolution. Prior to comments by Directors Heinicke and Oka, there are eight speakers (C. Fulkerson, B. Taranto. D. Schneider, Ed Healy, Carl Macmurdo, Tone Lee, Peter Witt, and Mark Gruberg.) The footage is from 1:08:28-1:30:30.
http://sanfrancisco.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=55&clip_id=11685
Board of Supervisors meeting, March 2, 2011
Linked below is the March 2 full Board of Supervisors meeting The taxi item, # 34, was done in two segments, from 13:37-19:13 and later from 1:04:22-1:05:38. Supervisor Scott Wiener amended the proposal to disallow the implementation of certain fines against illegal operators. I am informed that the amendments will effectively minimize SFPD enforcement, but that SFMTA will still be hiring new investigators authorized to levy $5,000 administrative citations against illegal operators. Supervisor Wiener also introduced a resolution supporting SFMTA's push to create a peak-time, or part-time, medallion system.
http://sanfrancisco.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=10&clip_id=11686
http://sanfrancisco.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=10&clip_id=11686
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)